Jump to Navigation

DeKalb, Texas, Lawsuit Against GM Highlights Auto Safety Standards

A recent personal injury lawsuit filed by DeKalb, Texas, resident Regina Matthews accused General Motors of negligently designing, manufacturing, assembling, marketing and testing their 2004 Chevrolet Venture minivans.

The Texas auto defect lawsuit is premised upon the fact that the airbag in Mrs. Matthews' vehicle failed to deploy in a crash, causing her torso to slam into the steering column and inflicting numerous injuries. She further accuses the automotive giant of failing to ensure safety standards were met in the design of the seat belt she wore. She alleges that it failed to lock into place upon impact and prevent her body from being snapped forward with the momentum of the vehicle.

While Mrs. Matthews' suit specifically involves an allegedly defective airbag and seatbelt restraint, - and is not directly tied to a widespread vehicle recall like the ones affecting the Toyota, Lexus and Pontiac brands - other high-profile automotive safety-related cases have involved sticking accelerators, defective brake mechanisms, faulty tires and improperly secured gas tanks.

Class action and individual claims for those auto defects have resulted in millions of dollars in damages and strengthening of vehicle safety laws around the country.

Components of an Auto Defect Claim

Nationwide automotive safety standards were first established in 1966 by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act. (Since then, the law has been modified to provide for additional or different standards.)

The law gave the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) - a division of the United States Department of Transportation - the power to set minimum safety standards for all vehicles and the authority to recall automobiles that don't meet those standards. Since the law was first enacted, nearly 400 million cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other types of vehicles all across the country, including Texas, have been recalled because of unsafe conditions.

Due in no small part to cases brought around the country, a myriad of safety-related defects (defined by the NHTSA as "a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment that poses a risk to safety and may exist in a group of vehicles of the same design or manufacture") have been brought to the attention of the NHTSA.

A claimant seeking to bring an auto defect case needs to pinpoint a particular design or manufacturing flaw that caused his or her injuries, show specific damages and prove how those damages were caused by the alleged defect.

Obviously, bringing a lawsuit against an automotive manufacturer or distributor is no small matter. The issue should be handled with great care and skill in order to have the best chance of success.

Can We Help You?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Read Our Blog Texas Biker Blog
Verdicts & Settlements
  • *Results below are examples of past success and are not a guarantee of particular results in your case.
  • $1.9 Million settlement against physician and hospital for neglect in a case involving infection of an IV site.
  • $1.6 Million settlement against trucking companies for negligence in causing accident which resulted in death.
  • $900,000 recovery for a motorcycle rider who suffered head injuries in an accident.
  • $3 Million recovered from major automobile manufacturer for dangerous design of car seat back, which collapsed and caused paraplegia in a 3 year old child.
  • $2 Million recovery from physician and hospital for neglect in the labor and delivery process, which resulted in brain injury to newborn.
  • $3 Million recovery in case involving unsafe arthritis medications which resulted in death.
  • $1 Million settlement against the owners of a bar for "dram shop liability" for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person.
  • $2.5 Million settlement against major automobile manufacturer for dangerous design of gas tanks, which resulted in fuel fed fire, causing death.
  • $2 Million recovery against major automobile manufacturer for dangerous design of gas tanks, which resulted in fuel fed fire, causing death.
  • $1 Million judgment against truck driver and corporate operator for negligence in causing traffic accident which resulted in death.
  • $3 Million recovery from major drug company for unsafe diet medications. Recovered multi-millions of dollars from various companies for sale of unsafe breast implants.
Click here to read more
Client Review
  • "This was a stressful situation and Mr. Colley walked us through the process, answered our questions, and got us the result we were looking for. I highly recommend him." - Gale
  • "In searching for an attorney, I feel very fortunate to have chosen Mr. Colley to represent me in my case. I respect him for his integrity, compassion and honest..." - Steve R.
  • "I found that Paul Colley, Jr. & associates were not only a very effective law firm, but they were very supportive and caring on a personal level when I was going through the toughest time in my life. I can't thank them enough!" - Ruth S.P.
  • "I was really lost concerning the legal process. Paul was very patient with me and answered all my mostly stupid questions. I can highly recommend Paul Colley..." - George Jr.
  • "After the accident I was unable to drive so Paul came to my home. He and his staff were extremely helpful and responsive. I've never been through something like this before, so he walked me through the process..." - LaeLonne
  • "I experienced nothing but top quality service. It's amazing how hard Mr. Colley works for his clients. Very helpful and friendly staff."
Click here to see more client reviews

Privacy Policy | Legal Marketing by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.